Date of Award

8-18-2020

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Psychological Science, MS

First Advisor

David Saarnio

Committee Members

Karen Yanowitz; Kristen Biondolillo

Call Number

LD 251 .A566t 2020 D25

Abstract

For better or worse, we use other people’s names to make judgements about them. The studies described here investigated people’s perceptions and judgements of names, using ratings of the central components of social cognition (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007): warmth and competence. The aim was to see whether or not people gave higher warmth and competence ratings to inspirational names than they gave to non-inspirational names. The results indicated that participants rated inspirational names as warmer and as more competent than non-inspirational names, although the effect was more pronounced on the warmth dimension. They rated inspirational names as more warm than competent, whereas they rated non-inspirational names very similarly on both warmth and competence. Therefore, inspirationality is a way by which we gauge the warmth and competence of others.

Rights Management

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.