Date of Award

2-10-2023

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Criminology and Criminal Justice, MA

First Advisor

Selye Lee

Committee Members

Angelo Brown; Averi Fegadel

Call Number

LD 251 .A566t 2022 H46

Abstract

Eyewitness identification evidence is extremely dependent on the processes utilized by law enforcement to acquire and uphold the evidence. Unquestionably, research has led to a variety of significant findings regarding the ways in which law enforcement obtains identification evidence from eyewitnesses. Despite these findings and academics' best efforts to disseminate their results to public agencies, policymakers, and important law enforcement personnel using a variety of evidence, changes to policy and practice have been slow to come about, if they have come at all. Using a sample of Chief Executive Officers (CEO) of police agencies in Arkansas (N = 69), we aimed to examine perceptions of the CEOs of eyewitness identification practices. This study found strengths and weaknesses regarding eyewitness identification procedures in Arkansas. Findings from this study found a majority of the respondents (p = 69), police chiefs, sheriffs, and directors of Arkansas law enforcement agencies, indicated their agencies had implemented written policies for show-ups and photographic lineups, and by a slim margin, acknowledged their agencies have adopted one of the “core four” recommendations – fair proper fillers. However, a majority of the respondents indicated they had not adopted the remaining best-practice recommendations: standardized pre-lineup instructions, double-blind administration, and contemporaneous confidence statements. Most of the respondents agree that voluntarily adopting model policies could prevent erroneous identifications; however, over two-thirds of the respondents believe a legislative mandate could prevent others. Furthermore, those respondents who have not adopted these preventive policies indicated there are reluctant positions within the criminal justice system with misguided perceptions preventing such initiatives. Policy implications of the results and recommendations for future research are included

Rights Management

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Included in

Criminology Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.