Date of Award

3-24-2021

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Educational Leadership, Ed.D.

First Advisor

Amany Saleh

Committee Members

Karen Graham; LaToshia Woods; Ryan Kelly; Tonja Fillippino

Call Number

LD 251 .A566d 2020 H68

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide data about the effects of early literacy instructional methods on later elementary reading performance. This study compared students who were introduced to reading through a synthetic phonics approach in contrast to students who were introduced to reading through an analytic phonics approach. Quantitative data were collected from a variety of standardized tests for the two groups, and qualitative data were collected through interviews with a variety of stakeholders. The literature review offers an overview of major trends in phonics and early reading instruction over the entire history of documented reading education. After examining the dramatic shifts between whole language and explicit phonics instruction, the focus was narrowed to two specific types of explicit phonics instruction: analytic and synthetic. The quantitative data were compared by looking at Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) results as well as Comprehensive Testing Program (CTP) results in the areas of reading comprehension, vocabulary, and spelling. All test scores were collected from fourth and fifth graders who had an analytic phonics education in early elementary and compared with test scores from fourth and fifth graders who had a synthetic phonics education in early elementary. Additionally, interviews were conducted with teachers, administrators, and parents who had experience with both groups of students. The researcher then conducted a content analysis to identify themes from these interviews. The researcher discusses the relative benefits and downsides to each phonics approach in an effort to inform curricular decisions in schools similar to this one. Overall, students who were taught using analytic phonics scored better on the CTP, but students who were taught using synthetic phonics scored better on the DRA. Stakeholder perceptions were favorable towards the synthetic phonics group. Due to the mixed results and other mitigating factors discussed in this study, more research is recommended to gather more data about these two early reading approaches in populations such as the school included in this study.

Rights Management

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.