Date of Award

6-18-2014

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Mathematics, MS

First Advisor

Hong Zhou

Committee Members

Debra Ingram; Ferebee Tunno

Call Number

LD 251 .A566t 2014 W5

Abstract

Multiplicity is a well established notion in statistics that arises when simultaneously testing n &ge2 individual hypotheses. To combat this issue, over time, numerous multiple comparison procedures have been developed. Such methods are relied upon heavily in confirmatory clinical trials, both in dose-finding and multiple-endpoint scenarios. The proposed procedure is a hybrid between the data-driven Weighted Holm procedure and the Fallback procedure which relies heavily on the a priori ordering of the hypotheses based on weights. Strong control of the familywise error rate is proven. Both general and previous clinical examples are performed utilizing this new method while comparing the outcomes to those of other techniques. Simulations test the proposed procedure against the Weighted Holm and the Fallback with varying weighting schemes and numbers of hypotheses. The results provide evidence that the proposed procedure outperforms the Weighted Holm in a multitude of scenarios while becoming increasingly competitive against the Fallback for larger n.

Rights Management

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Included in

Mathematics Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.